About the disappearance of birds and insects

Everyone who is interested in nature, ecology and environmental issues can't help but notice a major collapse in the diversity and quantity of birds and insects.

In contrast, one might think that some species are doing better, like sparrows, blackbirds, pigeons, starlings or crows, but this is not really the case.

In fact, even these species have problems in their development and remain few in number compared to the vastness of the areas they could occupy.

The official reasons for the disappearance

It is customary to propose the same causes for the disappearance of birds and insects:

• climate change

• predation by domestic cats

• pesticides

• natural habitat damaged or destroyed outright

• poaching

• the decrease in the number of insects starving insectivorous birds

I find this list extremely simplistic and even fallacious. In fact, I have carefully observed regions where these reasons do not really exist, and yet the collapse of insect and bird populations is obvious.

First of all, concerning the famous climate change, it does not explain why migratory birds, which adapt their migration routes very well when those are disturbed, still find themselves falling in numbers in a vertiginous way. Nor does it explain why the birds aren't just moving from area to area without dropping too much in numbers but are in fact largely dying out.

Secondly, predation by cats, which have been present among humans for centuries, would have suddenly become a major problem (sometimes ranked as the second most important cause of bird mortality). I don’t buy it.

Thirdly, pesticides, which are destructive of life by design, should surely be banned in many cases, but the fact is that they are already not used in quite large areas without any recovery of arthropod activity. Not to mention huge areas, especially forests and mountains, where they have never been used.

Fourthly, the destruction of habitats, which is constantly put forward to explain the sudden drop in animal populations, should also be reconsidered. In fact, in Europe, millions of hectares are currently in better ecological condition (at least in appearance) than they were several centuries ago: more woodlands, restored rivers, regional parks, biodiversity sanctuaries, etc.

While this destruction is unmistakable in some areas, it is absent in others, and it is quite the opposite in some others, where we genuinely acknowledge an improvement.

Fifthly, poaching, widely practiced for centuries and actually in decline, seems very unlikely to be a major cause of animal population collapse (and, like cat predation, does not explain insect disappearance). I even asked with a professional of fishes livestock that explained to me that certain species were absolutely impossible to annihilate through classical fishing methods since their habits naturally prevent their extinction, even if we would put a fisherman every ten meters of river.

And here, we are only talking about areas densely populated by humans, in some places, there is almost no poaching and yet we see insects and birds declining.

Finally, if the disappearance of insects obviously has an impact on the populations of insectivorous birds, this does not explain why non-insectivorous birds are also disappearing in the same incredible proportions. It is also a partial vision of the principles of equilibrium of wild populations, because when the prey decreases, the predators decrease and therefore the prey increases, and the predators increase in turn.

There is thus an explanatory weakness in the overall collapse of bird and insect populations, even if we combine all the mentioned reasons, it is still unlikely to really explain the phenomenon.

The probable reasons for the disappearance

I am therefore not very convinced by the "official" and "scientific" explanations on the subject, having myself been in the field to conduct some of these studies when I was studying biology of organisms and ecosystem dynamics.

I like science of course, but I also think that it is very badly practiced in our time and that politics influences it way too much. I accept that the common reasons invoked are something, they have an impact and can be discussed, but I tend to think it is a way to muddy the waters.

There are three elements that I consider to be carefully avoided and which nevertheless seem to me to be essential.

I will start with the less serious one, in my opinion, which is the destruction of billions of insects per day by fast transportation and especially by cars. If it seems more negligible for birds and bats, it is undeniable that a fast car fleet, driving on a whole national territory every day of the year, manages to kill hundreds of billions of insects. Of course, the fewer insects there are, the fewer insects are killed in this way, but it seems to me that this is a worldwide phenomenon that should not be overlooked.

Water pollution is also an issue that is clearly underestimated and under-discussed in my opinion, as it is a molecule that penetrate everywhere and is extremely used by all living organisms.

However, those two do not explain the disappearance of birds and insects in ecologically preserved areas and sometimes even with very few roads and pure water.

This is why I come to what appears to be without question the number one reason for the massive disappearance of birds and insects: artificial electromagnetic waves.

This is the only human phenomenon that I know of that is sufficiently vast, constant and continuous (there will soon be no place on the surface of the Earth that is not flooded by artificial electromagnetic waves) to be responsible for such a worldwide ecological disaster.

To know more about the negative effects of artificial EMF, take a look at my article on electroculture and the properties of trees.

Let's remember that it is a permanent pollution (day, night, in all seasons and for decades), extremely penetrating (trees and mountains reduce its impact but with mobile telephony antennas, the signal also comes from the sky and from now on there are antennas absolutely everywhere) and spread on the whole Earth in a systematic way.

A friend of mine recently pointed out that we never see any bird landing on cell phone antennas and I have to admit that it is absolutely correct, I never saw one.

Let's also remember that governments do nothing to allow the establishment of unpolluted white zones, that independent labs record endless conflicts of interest and corruption and that the media remains absolutely silent on the subject.

The deployment of 5G even has official exemptions in France so that the people are not informed. The frequency observatory, which previously had to be notified of the installation of a cell phone antenna, no longer has to be contacted. Even city councils can be bypassed and have no information about the antennas that are installed on their territory.

This reminds me of the obsession with climate change, while other extremely serious ecological problems are going on without anyone seeming to be concerned about them.

So let's also remember who owns the media and understand that the issues that are never talked about are usually the ones that matter most.

I took a screenshot of Europe from the OpenCellID website:

The white areas in the middle of the red dots are simply viewing artifacts due to the amount of data listed. All areas are covered with antennas. Red spots are signals, not antennas, but mean that there is an antenna in the close perimeter.

What we can do

I tend to propose solutions in my articles. I prefer to end on a call to action because the other way is resignation and that will not lead us to happiness but to slavery and disease.

What we are seeing in a blatant way with insects and birds is only an epiphenomenon of a larger process of destruction and defilement of life. We are primarily concerned, not least because we are responsible as a species, even if we are not generally responsible as individuals and often deplore it, but also because we are equally affected.

The first thing to do is to use the OpenCellId site (or any other reliable you find, the advantage of this one is that it uses open source databases) to take stock of the pollution of our environment. The more we know, the easier it will be to consider our options. Having an EMF meter is also a good way to see what our exposure to artificial EMFs is like through actual measurements. Personally, I will soon buy one, with a budget of 220 €/$.

For electrosensitive people in emergency situations, try to move to areas with less artificial EMF, but remember that this is just a strategic retreat. If your new comfort zone works for you, you will still need to defend it, as companies and governments will not let you have it for your own good.

Then, it is necessary to form local groups of influence, which will take over the whole subject, popularize it, propose information meetings, conferences, which will go to the town halls and prefectures, governors, in order to be heard. The idea is not so much to convince the elected officials and leaders but to make ourselves known, to influence little by little the culture and the public opinion so that the balance of power changes.

These groups will also be able to help set up places and rooms dedicated to the protection against artificial EMF. One can think of underground shelters and Faraday cages. We are not talking about a simple inconvenience but about a deadly global pollution, let's keep it in mind and remember by the way that this pollution affects our very mind and scrambles our thoughts. I invite everyone to try to go to places with low levels of artificial EMF to experience the difference on their mind.

In a second time, these groups of influence will be able to form alliances but let's be careful not to give any allegiance to anyone, because centralizing this kind of initiative is the best way to open the door to corruption and entryism of the telephone lobbies and corrupt governments and agencies.

Finally, and this is something that should be done in a discreet way and without claiming it, it is possible to dismantle or destroy cell phone antennas whose operation is harmful to life. It is illegal, but it is legitimate.

I am also quite convinced that in the future we may have civil wars between people who want to reform civilization to make it more synergetic (more conducive to life and harmony with nature) and people who want to prolong the vitiated model in which we live.

About the birds and insects, be sure that if we remove the major pollutions, they will grow again and find their natural place again in nature.

Life is extremely resilient, but we have to be less destructive to allow it to remain healthy and vivid. We also have to stop letting destructive people deciding for everyone on Earth.